Skip to main content

About Windows Executable File Size

This post is basically an effort to know what happens when we compile a simple Hello World program on Windows. In this case, I've used Visual Studio 2005.

First I've written a small usual Hello World program with all default settings provided by Visual Studio 2005.

The program looks like below:

int main(void)
{
    printf("Hello World build on VS 2005--Default\n");
    return 0;
}

The program compiled against the default C-runtime library. No changes have been done in any settings. I've built it in Debug as well as in release mode. In Debug build, the program size is 40 KB. In release build: Its size is 6 KB.

Now I've written another Hello World Program but switched off the default C-Runtime library. Rather, I've used the standard Windows library and provided definitions of functions like printf as well as the CRT start-up function. I've also switched off Buffer Security Check and Basic Runtime checks set to Default. The last two settings are enabled to avoid linking issues since I'm not going to use the standard C runtime library.

So the code looks like the below:

extern "C" int __cdecl printf(const char * format, ...)
{
    char szBuff[1024];
    int retValue;
    DWORD cbWritten;
    va_list argptr;
         
    va_start( argptr, format );
    retValue = wvsprintfA( szBuff, format, argptr );
    va_end( argptr );

    WriteFile(  GetStdHandle(STD_OUTPUT_HANDLE), szBuff, retValue, &cbWritten, 0 );

    return retValue;
}

int main(void)
{
    printf ("Hello World build on VS 2005\n");
    return 0;
}

int mainCRTStartup() // This is my CRT start-up finction which in turn invokes the main
{
    int retval;
   
    retval = main();
    ExitProcess(retval);
}

I've built this in Debug as well as in release mode. And amazingly the size was reduced to 24 KB in debug (16 KB less than the default one) and 3 KB in release (3 KB less than the default one as mentioned before). However, both program shows the same output.

This is one of the things Matt Pietrek has shown in his well-known article "Under the Hood" (http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/bb985746.aspx).

Note: The printf function has been adapted from Matt's article.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

XOR (Exclusive OR) for branchless coding

The following example shows the array reversing using the  XOR operator . No need to take any additional variable to reverse the array.   int main(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { char str[] = "I AM STUDENT"; int length = strlen(str); for(int i = 0; i < ((length/2)); i++) { str[i] ^= str[length - (1+i)]; str[length - (1+i)] ^= str[i]; str[i] ^= str[length - (1+i)]; } cout << str << endl; return 0; } The above example is one of the uses of XOR but XOR comes in handy when we can do branchless coding  methods like butterfly switch etc. Sometimes this is very effective in speeding up the execution.  Let's see one of the uses of XOR in branchless coding. I am taking a simple example of Y = | X |.  Yes, I am generating abs of a supplied number. So, my function signature/definition in C++ looks like below: int absoluteBranch( int x) {     if (x < 0 ) {         return ...
1 comment
Read more

Reversing char array without splitting the array to tokens

 I was reading about strdup, a C++ function and suddenly an idea came to my mind if this can be leveraged to aid in reversing a character array without splitting the array into words and reconstructing it again by placing spaces and removing trailing spaces. Again, I wanted an array to be passed as a function argument and an array size to be passed implicitly with the array to the function. Assumed, a well-formed char array has been passed into the function. No malformed array checking is done inside the function. So, the function signature and definition are like below: Below is the call from the client code to reverse the array without splitting tokens and reconstructing it. Finally, copy the reversed array to the destination.  For GNU C++, we should use strdup instead _strdup . On run, we get the following output: Demo code
Post a Comment
Read more

Power of Two

  I n this post will be discussing how to calculate if a number is a power of two or not. As an example, 8 is a power of two but the number 10 is not. There are many ways we can solve this. First , we will take an approach which is simple and iterative. In this case, we will calculate the power of two one by one and check with the supplied number. The below code illustrates it. bool isPowerofTwo(unsigned num) { auto y = 1; while (0 != y) { if (num == y) return true; if (num < y) return false; y <<= 1; } return false; } Second , assuming, the number is a 32-bit number, this is also an iterative solution. In this scenario, iterating all bits and counting the set bits. Any number which is a power of 2 will have only one bit set and the rest will be zeros. As an example, 8 in binary representation is 1000. Using this observation, we can implement an iterative solution. bool isPowerofTwo(unsigned num) { auto one_count = 0; for (auto index = 0; index < ...
Post a Comment
Read more